--- title: "In the cassation appeal, the defense counsel relied on the provisions of Art. 40 of the Criminal… — захисник — DecisionGateway" description: "statement by захисник, recorded recently — verbatim quote and source citation." canonical_url: "https://dgw.tmarket.io/claims/01a1d4e5-b0fc-775c-b0dc-005db6e72568" meta: "og:description": "statement by захисник, recorded recently — verbatim quote and source citation." "og:image": "https://dgw.tmarket.io/og.jpg" "og:image:alt": "White network of connected nodes crossed by a timeline on black" "og:image:height": "1024" "og:image:width": "1024" "og:title": "In the cassation appeal, the defense counsel relied on the provisions of Art. 40 of the Criminal… — захисник — DecisionGateway" "twitter:image": "https://dgw.tmarket.io/og.jpg" --- > Index of every page on this site: [llms.txt](https://dgw.tmarket.io/llms.txt) statement # **In the cassation appeal, the defense counsel relied on the provisions of Art. 40 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine and on the fact that the coercion was caused by the very fact of occupation and the threat of possible repressions in case of refusal to cooperate.** A statement by захисник. Statements are as reported by the cited publishers — not verified by DecisionGateway. > *У касаційній скарзі захисник посилався на положення ст. 40 КК України і на те, що примус був зумовлений самим фактом окупації та загрозою можливих репресій у разі відмови від співпраці.* supremecourtuaPublished 2026-11-03 [ Read source](https://t.me/supremecourtua/4408) ## **Related claims** [**The mere fact of a person's presence in temporarily occupied territory and existence in such conditions of general danger of unlawful influence by representatives of the aggressor state is not identical to physical or mental coercion within the meaning of Art. 40 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine.**ККС ВС · statement](https://dgw.tmarket.io/claims/01a1d4bb-7085-7e11-baff-64b4fcbe9ee3) [**The mere fact of a person's presence in temporarily occupied territory and existence under such conditions of general danger of unlawful influence by representatives of the aggressor state are not identical to physical or mental coercion within the meaning of Art. 40 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine.**ККС ВС · statement](https://dgw.tmarket.io/claims/01a1d4e5-b086-7074-bbc1-48356a8955fa) [**The OP KKS VS clarified which bodies, enterprises, institutions and organizations belong to illegal authorities created in temporarily occupied territory, including within the occupation administration of the aggressor state, within the meaning of Art. 111-1 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine.**ОП ККС ВС · statement](https://dgw.tmarket.io/claims/01a1d4cf-aaee-7146-8212-e8f040e88d7f) [**In this criminal proceeding, the courts of previous instances found the accused guilty and convicted him under Part 2 of Art. 111 and Part 5 of Art. 111-1 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine.**суди попередніх інстанцій · statement](https://dgw.tmarket.io/claims/01a1d4e5-b0a1-7ac7-8fbb-752b1cb6dc25) [**The court refused to grant the defense's motion to change the preventive measure.**hcacofficial · statement](https://dgw.tmarket.io/claims/01a1d4f4-73e1-7106-b44a-bc5ebebf6a8f) [**A ruling by an investigating judge establishing procedural time limits under Articles 28 and 114 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine, outside the procedures expressly provided for by that Code, is subject to appeal on the grounds provided by paragraph 17 of part 1 of Article 7 and part 1 of Article 24 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine, provided that such a ruling has a decisive influence on the course of the pre-trial investigation or the criminal proceedings as a whole.**supremecourtua · statement](https://dgw.tmarket.io/claims/01a1d4b8-acb2-714d-86e6-1ad1526cc9dd) [All claims](https://dgw.tmarket.io/claims) ```json {"@context":"https://schema.org","@graph":[{"@id":"https://dgw.tmarket.io/#website","@type":"WebSite","description":"Decisions, events and falsifiable forecasts from 3,800+ Telegram channels — every claim cited. Read free.","name":"DecisionGateway","url":"https://dgw.tmarket.io/","publisher":{"@id":"https://dgw.tmarket.io/#identity"}},{"@id":"https://dgw.tmarket.io/claims/01a1d4e5-b0fc-775c-b0dc-005db6e72568#webpage","@type":"WebPage","description":"statement by захисник, recorded recently — verbatim quote and source citation.","name":"In the cassation appeal, the defense counsel relied on the provisions of Art. 40 of the Criminal… — захисник — DecisionGateway","url":"https://dgw.tmarket.io/claims/01a1d4e5-b0fc-775c-b0dc-005db6e72568","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https://dgw.tmarket.io/claims/01a1d4e5-b0fc-775c-b0dc-005db6e72568#breadcrumb"},"isPartOf":{"@id":"https://dgw.tmarket.io/#website"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https://dgw.tmarket.io/claims/01a1d4e5-b0fc-775c-b0dc-005db6e72568"]}]},{"@id":"https://dgw.tmarket.io/#identity","@type":"Organization","name":"DecisionGateway","url":"https://dgw.tmarket.io"},{"@id":"https://dgw.tmarket.io/claims/01a1d4e5-b0fc-775c-b0dc-005db6e72568#breadcrumb","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","name":"Home","item":"https://dgw.tmarket.io","position":1},{"@type":"ListItem","name":"Claims","item":"https://dgw.tmarket.io/claims","position":2},{"@type":"ListItem","name":"In the cassation appeal, the defense counsel relied on the…","position":3}]},{"@id":"https://dgw.tmarket.io/claims/01a1d4e5-b0fc-775c-b0dc-005db6e72568#/schema/quotation/1","@type":"Quotation","dateCreated":"2026-11-03","isBasedOn":"https://t.me/supremecourtua/4408","text":"У касаційній скарзі захисник посилався на положення ст. 40 КК України і на те, що примус був зумовлений самим фактом окупації та загрозою можливих репресій у разі відмови від співпраці.","url":"/claims/01a1d4e5-b0fc-775c-b0dc-005db6e72568"}]} ``` ## Sitemap See the full [sitemap](https://dgw.tmarket.io/sitemap.md) for all pages.