statement
The Court held that permanent residence on the territory of Kazakhstan cannot be a mandatory condition for granting the state basic pension payment and the age pension payment to citizens of the Republic of Kazakhstan, provided they comply with other requirements established by law.
A statement by Конституционном суде. Statements are as reported by the cited publishers — not verified by DecisionGateway.
Суд указал, что постоянное проживание на территории Казахстана не может являться обязательным условием назначения государственной базовой пенсионной выплаты и пенсионной выплаты по возрасту гражданам РК при соблюдении ими иных установленных законом требований.
Related claims
In May 2026, the Constitutional Court confirmed that citizens of Kazakhstan can receive the basic pension and the age payment while living abroad if they meet the other requirements of the law.bessimptomno · statementAmendments to the Social Code will clarify the procedure for pension provision for citizens of Kazakhstan who have moved abroad for permanent residence.prg_jur · statementKazakhstanis who have moved abroad for permanent residence may face a new condition for receiving a pension.bessimptomno · predictionUnder the bill, receiving the state basic pension payment and the age pension payment abroad is to be carried out subject to annual confirmation that the citizen does not receive a similar pension in the country of residence.prg_jur · statementCriteria for forming investment portfolios from the pension assets of Kazakhstanis have been approved.prg_jur · statementThe Constitutional Court distinguished between the conditions for the emergence of the right to pension provision and the grounds for terminating payments.prg_jur · statement
More claims by Конституционном суде
The Constitutional Court noted that the return of an administrative claim, if the requirement does not relate to administrative court proceedings, is connected with the delimitation of types of court proceedings and does not restrict the right to judicial protection.statementThe Constitutional Court stated that a protest is brought only if there are lawful grounds.statementThe Constitutional Court stated that filing a request does not oblige the prosecutor to grant it.statementThe Constitutional Court stated that the grounds and procedure for cassation review are determined by procedural law.statementThe Constitutional Court stated that bringing a protest is a power of the prosecutor's office.statement
All claims by Конституционном суде