statement
The Constitutional Court held that questions of how exactly the cancellation of the decision affected remuneration and whether the courts correctly considered the case fall within the competence of courts of general jurisdiction.
A statement by КС. Statements are as reported by the cited publishers — not verified by DecisionGateway.
Вопросы о том, как именно отмена решения повлияла на оплату труда и правильно ли суды рассмотрели дело, относятся к компетенции судов общей юрисдикции.
Discussion
Related claims
The Constitutional Court held that cancellation of a decision of a body of a joint-stock company does not by itself terminate or change workers' labor rights that have already arisen.Конституционном суде · statementThe Constitutional Court noted that the return of an administrative claim, if the requirement does not relate to administrative court proceedings, is connected with the delimitation of types of court proceedings and does not restrict the right to judicial protection.Конституционном суде · statementThe Constitutional Court noted that the powers of the general meeting of shareholders are determined by law and the company's charter, and the right to cancel decisions of other bodies concerns only matters of internal activity and applies subject to restrictions established by law and the charter.КС · statementThe Fourth Cassation Court of General Jurisdiction dismissed the defendants' complaints and upheld the appellate ruling of the Rostov Regional Court, confirming the illegality of the administration's decision.ДонДэй · statementThe Constitutional Court distinguished between the conditions for the emergence of the right to pension provision and the grounds for terminating payments.prg_jur · statementThe Constitutional Court held that working conditions may be changed only on the grounds and in the manner provided by the Labor Code and the employment contract.КС · statement