statement
The Constitutional Court held that cancellation of a decision of a body of a joint-stock company does not by itself terminate or change workers' labor rights that have already arisen.
A statement by Конституционном суде. Statements are as reported by the cited publishers — not verified by DecisionGateway.
Отмена решения органа АО сама по себе не прекращает и не меняет уже возникшие трудовые права работников.
Related claims
The applicants believed that the norm allows a shareholder to cancel decisions affecting workers' labor rights without sufficient guarantees of their protection.Заявители · allegationThe Constitutional Court noted that the powers of the general meeting of shareholders are determined by law and the company's charter, and the right to cancel decisions of other bodies concerns only matters of internal activity and applies subject to restrictions established by law and the charter.КС · statementThe Constitutional Court held that unilateral change of the terms of an employment contract is, as a rule, not permitted.КС · statementThe Constitutional Court held that questions of how exactly the cancellation of the decision affected remuneration and whether the courts correctly considered the case fall within the competence of courts of general jurisdiction.КС · statementThe Constitutional Court held that working conditions may be changed only on the grounds and in the manner provided by the Labor Code and the employment contract.КС · statementThe Constitutional Court distinguished between the conditions for the emergence of the right to pension provision and the grounds for terminating payments.prg_jur · statement
More claims by Конституционном суде
The Court held that permanent residence on the territory of Kazakhstan cannot be a mandatory condition for granting the state basic pension payment and the age pension payment to citizens of the Republic of Kazakhstan, provided they comply with other requirements established by law.statementThe Constitutional Court noted that the return of an administrative claim, if the requirement does not relate to administrative court proceedings, is connected with the delimitation of types of court proceedings and does not restrict the right to judicial protection.statementThe Constitutional Court stated that a protest is brought only if there are lawful grounds.statementThe Constitutional Court stated that filing a request does not oblige the prosecutor to grant it.statementThe Constitutional Court stated that the grounds and procedure for cassation review are determined by procedural law.statement
All claims by Конституционном суде