statement

A ruling by an investigating judge establishing a procedural time limit, issued outside the procedure specifically defined by the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine, is subject to appeal if it has a decisive influence on the course of the pre-trial investigation or the criminal proceedings as a whole.

A statement by ВП ВС. Statements are as reported by the cited publishers — not verified by DecisionGateway.

Ухвала слідчого судді про встановлення процесуального строку, постановлена поза межами спеціально визначеної КПК України процедури, підлягає апеляційному оскарженню, якщо вона має визначальний вплив на рух досудового розслідування чи кримінального провадження загалом – ВП ВС
supremecourtuaPublished 2026-11-06 Read source

Related claims

A ruling of an investigating judge establishing a procedural time limit, issued outside the procedure specifically defined by the CPC of Ukraine, is subject to appeal if it has a decisive influence on the course of the pre-trial investigation or criminal proceedings as a whole.ВП ВС · statementA ruling by an investigating judge establishing procedural time limits under Articles 28 and 114 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine, outside the procedures expressly provided for by that Code, is subject to appeal on the grounds provided by paragraph 17 of part 1 of Article 7 and part 1 of Article 24 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine, provided that such a ruling has a decisive influence on the course of the pre-trial investigation or the criminal proceedings as a whole.supremecourtua · statementIf an accused person dies after an acquittal verdict has been appealed, the appellate court closes the appellate proceedings (or, where the verdict concerns several persons, closes them in the part concerning the deceased) on the basis of Art. 8, part 6 of Art. 9, point 5 of part 1 of Art. 284, and Art. 417 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine, except where the verdict was appealed by the defense as to the motives and grounds for acquittal and close relatives or family members of the deceased insist on continuing consideration of that appeal.Велика Палата Верховного Суду · statementWhen filing applications on an additional ground, the period is calculated from the day the judicial act refuting the factual grounds of the previously issued decision enters into legal force.Разъяснение № 2 · statementThe Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court determined the procedure for appellate review of an acquittal verdict concerning a person who died before its start.Велика Палата Верховного Суду · statementThe courts did not consider her arguments on the merits, citing missed procedural deadlines, and neither the second nor the third instance answered whether the blocking is lawful at all.Марина Таубер · allegation

More claims by ВП ВС

All claims by ВП ВС