statementSaid on 2026-11-06
A ruling by an investigating judge establishing procedural time limits under Articles 28 and 114 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine, outside the procedures expressly provided for by that Code, is subject to appeal on the grounds provided by paragraph 17 of part 1 of Article 7 and part 1 of Article 24 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine, provided that such a ruling has a decisive influence on the course of the pre-trial investigation or the criminal proceedings as a whole.
A statement by supremecourtua, said on 2026-11-06. Statements are as reported by the cited publishers — not verified by DecisionGateway.
Ухвала слідчого судді про встановлення процесуальних строків, ухвалена на підставі статей 28, 114 КПК України поза межами процедур, які прямо передбачені цим Кодексом, підлягає апеляційному оскарженню з підстав, передбачених п. 17 ч. 1 ст. 7, ч. 1 ст. 24 КПК України за умови, що така ухвала має визначальний вплив на рух досудового розслідування чи кримінального провадження загалом.
Related claims
A ruling by an investigating judge establishing a procedural time limit, issued outside the procedure specifically defined by the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine, is subject to appeal if it has a decisive influence on the course of the pre-trial investigation or the criminal proceedings as a whole.ВП ВС · statementA ruling of an investigating judge establishing a procedural time limit, issued outside the procedure specifically defined by the CPC of Ukraine, is subject to appeal if it has a decisive influence on the course of the pre-trial investigation or criminal proceedings as a whole.ВП ВС · statementIf an accused person dies after an acquittal verdict has been appealed, the appellate court closes the appellate proceedings (or, where the verdict concerns several persons, closes them in the part concerning the deceased) on the basis of Art. 8, part 6 of Art. 9, point 5 of part 1 of Art. 284, and Art. 417 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine, except where the verdict was appealed by the defense as to the motives and grounds for acquittal and close relatives or family members of the deceased insist on continuing consideration of that appeal.Велика Палата Верховного Суду · statementIn this criminal proceeding, the courts of previous instances found the accused guilty and convicted him under Part 2 of Art. 111 and Part 5 of Art. 111-1 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine.суди попередніх інстанцій · statementWhen filing applications on an additional ground, the period is calculated from the day the judicial act refuting the factual grounds of the previously issued decision enters into legal force.Разъяснение № 2 · statementThe conviction was under Part 4 of Article 368 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine.ВАКС · statement
More claims by supremecourtua
The Supreme Court, composed of the joint chamber of the Civil Cassation Court, reached these conclusions while ensuring the unity of judicial practice.statementFailure by a participant to comply with a general meeting decision, in particular failure to provide documents to update information on ultimate beneficial owners, is not grounds for forced exclusion of such a participant.statementThe Law of Ukraine "On Limited and Additional Liability Companies" establishes an exhaustive list of grounds for excluding a participant from a company: non-contribution of a share and death of a participant if their heirs have not applied to the LLC with an application to join.statementA child's temporary stay outside Ukraine must not restrict the child's right to maintain regular relations with both parents.statementEnsuring the child's best interests, preserving the child's family ties and establishing a real and effective communication arrangement is decisive.statement
All claims by supremecourtua