statementSaid on 2026-11-10
If the notice of a general meeting contains an item on dismissing the director and appointing a new one, the meeting may determine a specific dismissal date, confirm the previous decision and regulate the director's status until that date.
A statement by supremecourtua, said on 2026-11-10. Statements are as reported by the cited publishers — not verified by DecisionGateway.
Якщо повідомлення про загальні збори містить питання про звільнення директора та призначення нового, збори вправі визначити конкретну дату звільнення, підтвердити попереднє рішення та врегулювати статус директора до цієї дати.
Related claims
Determining the date of a director's dismissal and the director's status until that date are components of resolving the dismissal issue, not separate agenda items of a general meeting of a company.КГС ВС · statementTemporary suspension of the previous director from exercising powers while retaining salary for the transition period is in such a case a regulation of the consequences of dismissal, not a separate agenda item.supremecourtua · statementSuch decisions do not constitute consideration of items not included in the agenda if they do not create independent legal consequences different from those of dismissal and appointment.supremecourtua · statementFailure by a participant to comply with a general meeting decision, in particular failure to provide documents to update information on ultimate beneficial owners, is not grounds for forced exclusion of such a participant.supremecourtua · statementThe Constitutional Court noted that the powers of the general meeting of shareholders are determined by law and the company's charter, and the right to cancel decisions of other bodies concerns only matters of internal activity and applies subject to restrictions established by law and the charter.КС · statementThe rulings contain conclusions that the grounds for excluding a participant from an LLC are exhaustive and that exclusion is impossible for failure to comply with a general meeting decision.Огляд актуальної судової практики Касаційного господарського суду у складі Верховного Суду · statement
More claims by supremecourtua
The Supreme Court, composed of the joint chamber of the Civil Cassation Court, reached these conclusions while ensuring the unity of judicial practice.statementFailure by a participant to comply with a general meeting decision, in particular failure to provide documents to update information on ultimate beneficial owners, is not grounds for forced exclusion of such a participant.statementThe Law of Ukraine "On Limited and Additional Liability Companies" establishes an exhaustive list of grounds for excluding a participant from a company: non-contribution of a share and death of a participant if their heirs have not applied to the LLC with an application to join.statementA child's temporary stay outside Ukraine must not restrict the child's right to maintain regular relations with both parents.statementEnsuring the child's best interests, preserving the child's family ties and establishing a real and effective communication arrangement is decisive.statement
All claims by supremecourtua