Claims
What was said, typed and attributed. Statements as reported by the cited publishers — not verified by DecisionGateway.
Follow via RSS — the 30 newest claims in any reader, no account needed.
Claims by
statementThe Supreme Court, composed of the joint chamber of the Civil Cassation Court, reached these conclusions while ensuring the unity of judicial practice.supremecourtuastatementFailure by a participant to comply with a general meeting decision, in particular failure to provide documents to update information on ultimate beneficial owners, is not grounds for forced exclusion of such a participant.supremecourtuastatementThe Law of Ukraine "On Limited and Additional Liability Companies" establishes an exhaustive list of grounds for excluding a participant from a company: non-contribution of a share and death of a participant if their heirs have not applied to the LLC with an application to join.supremecourtuastatementA child's temporary stay outside Ukraine must not restrict the child's right to maintain regular relations with both parents.supremecourtuastatementEnsuring the child's best interests, preserving the child's family ties and establishing a real and effective communication arrangement is decisive.supremecourtuastatementParticular attention is given to the legal consequences of concealing the child's place of residence abroad, to the performance of agreements between parents, and to the participation of other relatives in the child's upbringing and the resolution of related disputes in the absence of a conclusion from the guardianship and custody authority.supremecourtuastatementThe review highlights the Supreme Court's legal positions on these issues, including the specifics of organizing remote communication, resolving conflicts between parents, ensuring the child's safety and taking the child's opinion into account.supremecourtuastatementThe review covers the case law of the Civil Cassation Court within the Supreme Court on participation in upbringing and communication with children temporarily residing outside Ukraine, for decisions from 2024 to August 2026.supremecourtuastatementTaking into account the rules of Articles 321, 391 of the Civil Code of Ukraine, a proper and effective way to protect the state's rights to protective radiation shelters / structures as a type of civil protection (civil defense) protective structures is a negatory claim.supremecourtuastatementSuch structures belonged to objects of national importance, were in state ownership, and by their designated purpose are needed for the state to perform its functions to ensure its defense capability and protect the life and health of the population from the consequences of accidents, catastrophes of technogenic, ecological, natural and military nature.supremecourtuastatementUnder Part 2 of Article 5 of the Law of Ukraine "On Privatization of State Property", protective radiation shelters / structures, as a type of civil protection (civil defense) protective structures, were not subject to privatization (alienation).supremecourtuastatementTemporary suspension of the previous director from exercising powers while retaining salary for the transition period is in such a case a regulation of the consequences of dismissal, not a separate agenda item.supremecourtuastatementSuch decisions do not constitute consideration of items not included in the agenda if they do not create independent legal consequences different from those of dismissal and appointment.supremecourtuastatementIf the notice of a general meeting contains an item on dismissing the director and appointing a new one, the meeting may determine a specific dismissal date, confirm the previous decision and regulate the director's status until that date.supremecourtuastatementThe experience of Ukrainian justice under wartime conditions contributes to the development of international law.supremecourtuastatementThe Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court reached this conclusion.supremecourtuastatementA ruling by an investigating judge establishing procedural time limits under Articles 28 and 114 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine, outside the procedures expressly provided for by that Code, is subject to appeal on the grounds provided by paragraph 17 of part 1 of Article 7 and part 1 of Article 24 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine, provided that such a ruling has a decisive influence on the course of the pre-trial investigation or the criminal proceedings as a whole.supremecourtuastatementThe Commercial Court of Cassation within the Supreme Court reached this conclusion.supremecourtuastatementThe Supreme Court, composed of a panel of judges of the First Judicial Chamber of the Civil Cassation Court, reached these conclusions.supremecourtuastatementThe court determines the amount of compensation depending on the nature and extent of suffering, duration of non-pecuniary losses and other circumstances, based on the principles of reasonableness, prudence and fairness.supremecourtua
20 of 30