statementSaid on 2026-11-03
The review covers the case law of the Civil Cassation Court within the Supreme Court on participation in upbringing and communication with children temporarily residing outside Ukraine, for decisions from 2024 to August 2026.
A statement by supremecourtua, said on 2026-11-03. Statements are as reported by the cited publishers — not verified by DecisionGateway.
Огляд судової практики Касаційного цивільного суду у складі Верховного Суду щодо участі у вихованні та спілкуванні з дітьми, які тимчасово проживають за межами України (рішення за період із 2024 року до серпня 2026 року)
Related claims
A child's temporary stay outside Ukraine must not restrict the child's right to maintain regular relations with both parents.supremecourtua · statementThe review highlights the Supreme Court's legal positions on these issues, including the specifics of organizing remote communication, resolving conflicts between parents, ensuring the child's safety and taking the child's opinion into account.supremecourtua · statementParticular attention is given to the legal consequences of concealing the child's place of residence abroad, to the performance of agreements between parents, and to the participation of other relatives in the child's upbringing and the resolution of related disputes in the absence of a conclusion from the guardianship and custody authority.supremecourtua · statementThe review of the Cassation Administrative Court within the Supreme Court in administrative cases on labor matters is supplemented with current legal positions for the period from May 2022 to June 2026.supremecourtua · statementThe review summarizes key legal positions of the Supreme Court formed from January 2018 to June 2026 based on consideration of the relevant category of administrative cases.supremecourtua · statementA person residing in Ukraine may apply to the court at their place of residence with a claim against a foreign healthcare institution for compensation for damage caused by injury to health.КЦС ВС · statement
More claims by supremecourtua
The Supreme Court, composed of the joint chamber of the Civil Cassation Court, reached these conclusions while ensuring the unity of judicial practice.statementFailure by a participant to comply with a general meeting decision, in particular failure to provide documents to update information on ultimate beneficial owners, is not grounds for forced exclusion of such a participant.statementThe Law of Ukraine "On Limited and Additional Liability Companies" establishes an exhaustive list of grounds for excluding a participant from a company: non-contribution of a share and death of a participant if their heirs have not applied to the LLC with an application to join.statementA child's temporary stay outside Ukraine must not restrict the child's right to maintain regular relations with both parents.statementEnsuring the child's best interests, preserving the child's family ties and establishing a real and effective communication arrangement is decisive.statement
All claims by supremecourtua