statement
In the cassation appeal, the defense counsel relied on the provisions of Art. 40 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine and on the fact that the coercion was caused by the very fact of occupation and the threat of possible repressions in case of refusal to cooperate.
A statement by захисник. Statements are as reported by the cited publishers — not verified by DecisionGateway.
У касаційній скарзі захисник посилався на положення ст. 40 КК України і на те, що примус був зумовлений самим фактом окупації та загрозою можливих репресій у разі відмови від співпраці.
Related claims
The mere fact of a person's presence in temporarily occupied territory and existence in such conditions of general danger of unlawful influence by representatives of the aggressor state is not identical to physical or mental coercion within the meaning of Art. 40 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine.ККС ВС · statementThe mere fact of a person's presence in temporarily occupied territory and existence under such conditions of general danger of unlawful influence by representatives of the aggressor state are not identical to physical or mental coercion within the meaning of Art. 40 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine.ККС ВС · statementThe OP KKS VS clarified which bodies, enterprises, institutions and organizations belong to illegal authorities created in temporarily occupied territory, including within the occupation administration of the aggressor state, within the meaning of Art. 111-1 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine.ОП ККС ВС · statementIn this criminal proceeding, the courts of previous instances found the accused guilty and convicted him under Part 2 of Art. 111 and Part 5 of Art. 111-1 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine.суди попередніх інстанцій · statementThe court refused to grant the defense's motion to change the preventive measure.hcacofficial · statementA ruling by an investigating judge establishing procedural time limits under Articles 28 and 114 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine, outside the procedures expressly provided for by that Code, is subject to appeal on the grounds provided by paragraph 17 of part 1 of Article 7 and part 1 of Article 24 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine, provided that such a ruling has a decisive influence on the course of the pre-trial investigation or the criminal proceedings as a whole.supremecourtua · statement