statement
The conviction was under Part 4 of Article 368 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine.
A statement by ВАКС. Statements are as reported by the cited publishers — not verified by DecisionGateway.
(ч. 4 ст. 368 КК України)
Related claims
A ruling by an investigating judge establishing procedural time limits under Articles 28 and 114 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine, outside the procedures expressly provided for by that Code, is subject to appeal on the grounds provided by paragraph 17 of part 1 of Article 7 and part 1 of Article 24 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine, provided that such a ruling has a decisive influence on the course of the pre-trial investigation or the criminal proceedings as a whole.supremecourtua · statementThe mere fact of a person's presence in temporarily occupied territory and existence in such conditions of general danger of unlawful influence by representatives of the aggressor state is not identical to physical or mental coercion within the meaning of Art. 40 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine.ККС ВС · statementThe Parliament approved bill No. 15503 in the second reading and as a whole, amending the Civil Code of Ukraine to ensure compliance with European Union legal acts and European Payments Council (EPC) criteria for Ukraine's accession to the Single Euro Payments Area (SEPA).interfax_uk · statementThe experience of Ukrainian justice under wartime conditions contributes to the development of international law.supremecourtua · statementThe joint chamber of the Criminal Cassation Court within the Supreme Court reached these conclusions based on its review of case No. 766/12788/24.ОП ККС ВС · statementA ruling by an investigating judge establishing a procedural time limit, issued outside the procedure specifically defined by the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine, is subject to appeal if it has a decisive influence on the course of the pre-trial investigation or the criminal proceedings as a whole.ВП ВС · statement
More claims by ВАКС
The confiscated property includes 1/2 of a non-residential premises, a land plot, a 2007 Volkswagen Touareg and $2 thousand.statementThe court imposed a penalty of 10 years' imprisonment with confiscation of all his property.statementOn 10 November 2026 the Higher Anti-Corruption Court found the former acting director of the Chornomorsk seaport guilty of receiving an unlawful benefit.statementThe Higher Anti-Corruption Court sentenced the former acting director of the Chornomorsk seaport to 10 years in prison for bribery.statement
All claims by ВАКС